But here's your quote recently.....
"Contrary to many people's opinion. Spyre doesn't have an unlimited budget. I think their NIL package with Carnell was better than the Buckeyes. I think the Buckeyes closed the gap on that deal greatly the last few weeks and I think Ohio State has been a favorite of Tate's for a while which is why most predicted him there months ago.
When Buckeyes NIL deal was with Tennessee's and the money was pretty much a push, he chose the school he has always liked."
--------------------------------------------------------
This means programs are talking NIL while recruiting players.....where's the line? There is no line from the quote above imo. Anyone thinking it's only for current roster players has their head in the sand. Has anything changed the last few months or is this a case UTs just not winning big battles right now with a few guys in the news currently?
Appears you can do everything we did before when it comes to NIL except sign the player on the dotted line like we did Nico
@Brent_Hubbs
"Contrary to many people's opinion. Spyre doesn't have an unlimited budget. I think their NIL package with Carnell was better than the Buckeyes. I think the Buckeyes closed the gap on that deal greatly the last few weeks and I think Ohio State has been a favorite of Tate's for a while which is why most predicted him there months ago.
When Buckeyes NIL deal was with Tennessee's and the money was pretty much a push, he chose the school he has always liked."
--------------------------------------------------------
This means programs are talking NIL while recruiting players.....where's the line? There is no line from the quote above imo. Anyone thinking it's only for current roster players has their head in the sand. Has anything changed the last few months or is this a case UTs just not winning big battles right now with a few guys in the news currently?
Appears you can do everything we did before when it comes to NIL except sign the player on the dotted line like we did Nico
@Brent_Hubbs
