Are they in the dump? If not, where are those communications. No way that zero communications happened there. Having done just a quick search, I am pretty sure that even Currie's private phones/accounts/devices are also covered under the FOI act. Now, what is considered a private conversation would come into play...but if Currie was doing the business of UT...those communications should be covered. Always important to remember that what is NOT released is as important as what is released....basically paraphrasing a negotiating tenant where what is not said is as important as what is said. Where are those communications?
