http://www.cbssports.com/college-ba...caas-allegations-what-it-said-and-whats-next/http://www.cbssports.com/college-ba...caas-allegations-what-it-said-and-whats-next/
These 3 are the ones they are fighting:
Allegation No. 1: Jan Boxill, women's basketball athletic academic counselor in the Academic Support Program for Student-Athletes (ASPSA) knowingly provided extra benefits in the form of impermissible academic assistance and special arrangements to women's basketball student-athletes.
Response: North Carolina agrees "that in 15 of the 18 alleged instances, Boxill provided extra benefits in violation of Bylaw 16.11.2.1 in her capacity as an ASPSA academic counselor." However, UNC is arguing that her actions do not fall under the NCAA's definition of unethical conduct, "even though her actions fell short of the University's own standards."
Allegation No. 4: From the 2005 fall semester through the 2011 summer semester, the University of North Carolina violated the NCAA Principle of Rules Compliance in its failure to monitor the ASPSA and the African and Afro-American Studies department.
Response: North Carolina is fighting the failure to monitor charge, believing the issues fall under the jurisdiction of the school's accrediting agency, SACSCOC, not the NCAA.
Allegation No. 5: The NCAA has charged UNC with a violating the NCAA Principle of Institutional Control and Responsibility.
Response: North Carolina does not agree with the lack of institutional control charge. Bubba Cunningham said Tuesday on a conference call that while academic irregularities didn't meet the standards of the university they didn't necessarily violate an NCAA bylaw.
These 3 are the ones they are fighting:
Allegation No. 1: Jan Boxill, women's basketball athletic academic counselor in the Academic Support Program for Student-Athletes (ASPSA) knowingly provided extra benefits in the form of impermissible academic assistance and special arrangements to women's basketball student-athletes.
Response: North Carolina agrees "that in 15 of the 18 alleged instances, Boxill provided extra benefits in violation of Bylaw 16.11.2.1 in her capacity as an ASPSA academic counselor." However, UNC is arguing that her actions do not fall under the NCAA's definition of unethical conduct, "even though her actions fell short of the University's own standards."
Allegation No. 4: From the 2005 fall semester through the 2011 summer semester, the University of North Carolina violated the NCAA Principle of Rules Compliance in its failure to monitor the ASPSA and the African and Afro-American Studies department.
Response: North Carolina is fighting the failure to monitor charge, believing the issues fall under the jurisdiction of the school's accrediting agency, SACSCOC, not the NCAA.
Allegation No. 5: The NCAA has charged UNC with a violating the NCAA Principle of Institutional Control and Responsibility.
Response: North Carolina does not agree with the lack of institutional control charge. Bubba Cunningham said Tuesday on a conference call that while academic irregularities didn't meet the standards of the university they didn't necessarily violate an NCAA bylaw.
Last edited:
