Every so often, one of my fellow Volquesters says something so clever, affirming, or informative that I feel obliged to give it a "like."
More often than not, I'll be reading a thread well after it's been chewed up and spat out; but, after having read the original post, I'll think of something that I think is clever and worth adding to the dialogue... until I find that someone has already said it. Naturally, that person deserves a like.
The affirming or informative categories are likely self-explanatory, methinks... tho' I'm thinking that a more positive informative post is what tends to get me to like it.
Anyway, just curious what your standard is for giving or not giving something a like. It seems that the posts that are most likely to get a "like" are: 1) posts that the mods make that put a poster in their place [see @Austin_Price], 2) posts that give some kind of positive insight into the status of a recruit we could definitely use on the roster, or 3) posts that disparage @akavff.
More often than not, I'll be reading a thread well after it's been chewed up and spat out; but, after having read the original post, I'll think of something that I think is clever and worth adding to the dialogue... until I find that someone has already said it. Naturally, that person deserves a like.
The affirming or informative categories are likely self-explanatory, methinks... tho' I'm thinking that a more positive informative post is what tends to get me to like it.
Anyway, just curious what your standard is for giving or not giving something a like. It seems that the posts that are most likely to get a "like" are: 1) posts that the mods make that put a poster in their place [see @Austin_Price], 2) posts that give some kind of positive insight into the status of a recruit we could definitely use on the roster, or 3) posts that disparage @akavff.
