Let me say that I am a Fulmer guy. I had season tickets for about 15 years in the Fulmer era, so I have many fond memories of experiencing some great football.
I wanted him to get the AD job in the beginning. I was pretty POed when Bev, a total outsider, decided to give the job to Currie. I thought it was bogus for her to use the excuse that she wanted someone who had run a power 5 athletic department. In my mind, who could have been a better candidate than CPF. In hindsight, I feel that my beliefs are clearly vindicated based on the cluster that ensued.
Here's my question. Why am I not hearing anything negative about Bev? Even if she was being led by the nose by HOH, I still feel the she is partially culpable and should carry some of the burden of responsibility. VQ has its fair number of attack dogs, and yet I hear nothing negative about BD. The silence seems a little strange to me.
Maybe I'm wrong here. Obviously there are lots of facts of which I'm unaware. Let's hear some other opinions.
I wanted him to get the AD job in the beginning. I was pretty POed when Bev, a total outsider, decided to give the job to Currie. I thought it was bogus for her to use the excuse that she wanted someone who had run a power 5 athletic department. In my mind, who could have been a better candidate than CPF. In hindsight, I feel that my beliefs are clearly vindicated based on the cluster that ensued.
Here's my question. Why am I not hearing anything negative about Bev? Even if she was being led by the nose by HOH, I still feel the she is partially culpable and should carry some of the burden of responsibility. VQ has its fair number of attack dogs, and yet I hear nothing negative about BD. The silence seems a little strange to me.
Maybe I'm wrong here. Obviously there are lots of facts of which I'm unaware. Let's hear some other opinions.
