In this article, Denis Dodd says the 85 number is not required this year but everyone must be back to in 2023. Have you heard this? This is the only place I have seen this mentioned. Everywhere I searched stated that 85 was the 2022 number.
If more than 85, seems that might be a factor in how we manage transfers? Maybe super seniors don't count in 22?
You heard anything?
here is Dodd reference
As such, coaches do not have to strictly adhere to the 85-man limit in 2022; however, they must find a way to pare their rosters back down to 85 ahead of the 2023 season.
Article was about ACC rejecting expansion to playoffs is where this came up.
www.cbssports.com
@Brent_Hubbs
If more than 85, seems that might be a factor in how we manage transfers? Maybe super seniors don't count in 22?
You heard anything?
here is Dodd reference
As such, coaches do not have to strictly adhere to the 85-man limit in 2022; however, they must find a way to pare their rosters back down to 85 ahead of the 2023 season.
Article was about ACC rejecting expansion to playoffs is where this came up.
Inside the ACC's rejection of College Football Playoff expansion amid concerns about larger issues
ACC coaches and officials want other problems solved before tackling potential CFP expansion
www.cbssports.com
@Brent_Hubbs
