The article on Volquest front page reports the letter from Tennessee to Tyndale , " On March, 16, 2015, you acknowledged that on, or around November 18, 2014, you deleted e-mails contained in an e-mail account maintained at a prior institution, to which you still had access. You knew that e-mails sent to and from that e-mail account were the subject of questioning by the NCAA enforcement staff on November 18, 2014 and that the NCAA would be requesting you and/or the prior institution to provide copies of e-mails from that e-mail account. Those e-mails could have been relevant to the NCAA's investigation of Southern Miss and/or compliance with the NCAA rules. At minimum, the deletion of those e-mails created an appearance of significant impropriety.
With respect to the conduct described in the previous paragraph the University believes that it's highly likely that the Committee on Infractions will find that violated NCAA bylaw 19.1.1 identifies "failure to cooperate in an NCAA enforcement investigation".
Well my question is if deleting an email is so bad, then why is there a double standard as to the Secretary of State spiking emails from a Senate investigation. I thought it has been established that if email deletion has taken place all we have to do to clarify the issue is to determine what the perpetrator has to say about it, and voila the problem is solved.
With respect to the conduct described in the previous paragraph the University believes that it's highly likely that the Committee on Infractions will find that violated NCAA bylaw 19.1.1 identifies "failure to cooperate in an NCAA enforcement investigation".
Well my question is if deleting an email is so bad, then why is there a double standard as to the Secretary of State spiking emails from a Senate investigation. I thought it has been established that if email deletion has taken place all we have to do to clarify the issue is to determine what the perpetrator has to say about it, and voila the problem is solved.
