Everyone knows that the more game time experience a QB has the more they develop
and the better they become, generally.
So if I told you that you had a choice between two QBs with the following scenarios what would you think;
A) This QB has played the position all his life, started 4 yrs on varsity level high school.....
B) This QB played baseball all his life and only started playing QB in the 8th grade and only played 1 yr varsity in high school.
Knowing nothing more about QB A or B one would generally think that QB A would be way better and much more developed than QB B.
So obviously A = Bailey and B = Shrout....
But from what I’ve seen thus far, Shrout looks much better and more talented than Bailey does and considering where they each are in terms of development I think Shrout is the better option with much more upside from here. If this is the case, and clearly it is, then why isn’t Pruitt starting JT Shrout instead of Bailey?
and the better they become, generally.
So if I told you that you had a choice between two QBs with the following scenarios what would you think;
A) This QB has played the position all his life, started 4 yrs on varsity level high school.....
B) This QB played baseball all his life and only started playing QB in the 8th grade and only played 1 yr varsity in high school.
Knowing nothing more about QB A or B one would generally think that QB A would be way better and much more developed than QB B.
So obviously A = Bailey and B = Shrout....
But from what I’ve seen thus far, Shrout looks much better and more talented than Bailey does and considering where they each are in terms of development I think Shrout is the better option with much more upside from here. If this is the case, and clearly it is, then why isn’t Pruitt starting JT Shrout instead of Bailey?
