ADVERTISEMENT

Grading the SEC (not a pretty picture)

Volznut

Well-Known Member
Aug 1, 2008
30,330
9,051
113
Bad start overall for the SEC.

East:

UT: D-. Terrible performance overall, defense did adjust in second half. Would have been an F if they had lost
UF: D-. Offense looked sloppy, bad running game. Defense was Meh. Good kicker.
USCe: D. Both offense and defense were bad, and they now have a QB controversy. Barely pulled one out against Vandy
UGA: B. Running game is good, and it looks like Eason will end up being the real deal.
Vandy: F. Offense is horrific. Defense is good but wears down. Lost to a bad USCe team at home.
UK: F-. Lost to a team they should have beaten, at home. Epic meltdown in second half. Defense is bad.
Mizzou: F: Mizzou is a terrible team. Offense is awful, defense is ok. Long year coming.

West:

Bama: A+. Destroyed a top 20 team, looked good on everything.
Auburn: C. Defense looked pretty good, slowed down a powerful Clemson offense. Offense is terrible, and they can't decide on a QB.
LSU: F. Offense is anemic, defense is ok but not as good as advertised. Les Miles on the hot seat again
Miss St: F-. Losing at home to South Alabama?
Ole Miss: D. One dimensional offense, secondary is not good.
Arkansas: D - . Struggled to beat La Tech at home. winning by 1. Just overall a very bland performance
aTm: B+. Beat a top 20 team, defense was surprisingly good, offense was effective with Knight. Not sure how good UCLA is.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Go Big.
Get Premium.

Join Rivals to access this premium section.

  • Say your piece in exclusive fan communities.
  • Unlock Premium news from the largest network of experts.
  • Dominate with stats, athlete data, Rivals250 rankings, and more.
Log in or subscribe today Go Back