ADVERTISEMENT

Reading between the lines in Hart's contract amendment...

EarlVolFan

Well-Known Member
Feb 2, 2005
5,842
4,311
113
....was there something else going on that the public didn't know about?

He has forfeited part of his future compensation due in the rest of his contract that he could have demanded be paid to him. Also, the addition of the clause that prevents negative comments from UT administrators about him and the fact he can be relieved of his duties with a 15 day notice makes one think that he was not dealing from a position of power in his 'retirement' negotiations.

Please, no inflammatory personal insults from the usual suspects.

I would like someone who has experience in contract negotiations to give their opinion about why someone would agree to less than 100% of the compensation called for in their contract.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PredVol
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Go Big.
Get Premium.

Join Rivals to access this premium section.

  • Say your piece in exclusive fan communities.
  • Unlock Premium news from the largest network of experts.
  • Dominate with stats, athlete data, Rivals250 rankings, and more.
Log in or subscribe today Go Back